St. Louis City vs Toronto FC Prediction

St. Louis City
3-1
Finished
HT 1-0
Toronto FC
CITYPARK, St. Louis· L. Szpala 20/09/2026

AI Best Pick

Statistical forecasts for entertainment purposes only - not betting or financial advice.

Data Quality
Complete
Match Importance
4.4 / 10
AI Best Pick
78%Trust
Double Chance
Home Win or Draw
1.17
SignalSOLIDModel59%RiskMediumGap-7.0%
Value Analysis
67%Trust
Total Cards
Cards Under 4.5
1.64
SignalGOODModel67%RiskMediumGap+4.3%
St. Louis City Rest
2 days
Toronto FC Rest
7 days

Match Forecasts

Match Result
1
60%1.62
X
21%4.26
2
19%4.78
Double Chance
1X
81%1.17
X2
40%2.23
Both Teams to Score
Yes
63%1.50
No
37%2.48
Goals
Projected Goals: 2.45 + 1.05 = 3.50
Over 1.5
89%1.11
Over 2.5
73%1.43
Over 3.5
50%2.11
Under 1.5
11%6.00
Under 2.5
27%2.79
Under 3.5
50%1.73
Corners
Projected Corners: 6 + 4.1 = 10.1
Over 8.5
67%1.67
Over 9.5
55%2.01
Over 10.5
39%2.63
Under 8.5
33%2.09
Under 9.5
45%1.70
Under 10.5
61%1.39
Cards
Projected Cards: 1.6 + 2.2 = 3.8
Over 3.5
53%1.62
Over 4.5
33%2.19
Under 3.5
47%2.20
Under 4.5
67%1.64

Match Events

23'W. Zimmerman
28'C. Wallem
41'C. HolseAssist: A. Matan
46'S. Jeong INS. Becher out
54'T. TotlandAssist: A. Matan
57'W. Zimmerman INN. Gomis out
63'D. Etienne INZ. Monlouis out
63'N. Dorsch INJ. Osorio out
63'M. Cimermancic INT. Corbeanu out
68'S. BecherAssist: C. Wallem
73'F. Fall
74'A. Coello
75'J. Sargent INL. Morgan out
78'C. Wallem IND. Polvara out
79'A. Matan IND. Edelman out
85'Rafael Navarro IND. Downs out
90'Goal Disallowed - video reviewD. Downs
90+2'C. Holse INT. Ostrak out
90+7'T. CorbeanuAssist: A. Coello

Lineups

St. Louis City
3-4-3Coach: Yoann Damet
Toronto FC
4-2-3-1Coach: Robin Fraser
Roman Bürki1R. BürkiRoman Bürki
Jaziel Orozco99J. OrozcoJaziel Orozco
Timo Baumgartl32T. BaumgartlTimo Baumgartl
Fallou Fall27F. FallFallou Fall
Conrad Wallem6C. WallemConrad Wallem
Christopher Durkin8C. DurkinChristopher Durkin
Alexandru Mățan23A. MățanAlexandru Mățan
Tomas Totland14T. TotlandTomas Totland
Jeong Sang-bin77J. Sang-binJeong Sang-bin
Rafael Navarro9R. NavarroRafael Navarro
Carlo Holse19C. HolseCarlo Holse
Luka Gavran1L. GavranLuka Gavran
Richie Laryea22R. LaryeaRichie Laryea
Walker Zimmerman25W. ZimmermanWalker Zimmerman
Benjamin Kuscevic13B. KuscevicBenjamin Kuscevic
Matheus Pereira3M. PereiraMatheus Pereira
Alonso Coello14A. CoelloAlonso Coello
Niklas Dorsch6N. DorschNiklas Dorsch
Derrick Etienne11D. EtienneDerrick Etienne
Markus Cimermancic71M. CimermancicMarkus Cimermancic
Dániel Sallói20D. SallóiDániel Sallói
Josh Sargent9J. SargentJosh Sargent

St. Louis City Substitutes

11Simon BecherF
24Daniel EdelmanM
21Dante PolvaraM
42Damion DownsF
39Benjamin LundtG
5Lukas MacNaughtonD
59Mykhi JoynerM
7Tomáš OstrákM
20Rafael SantosD

Toronto FC Substitutes

15Nickseon GomisD
21Jonathan OsorioM
7Theo CorbeanuF
12Zane MonlouisD
90Lewis MorganF
23William YarbroughG
38Jackson GilmanD
19Kobe FranklinD
17Emilio AristizábalF

Match Stats

St. Louis CityToronto FC
62%Ball Possession38%
8Corner Kicks4
2Yellow Cards2
17Total Shots9
8Shots on Goal1
5Shots off Goal2
14Shots Inside Box4
3Shots Outside Box5
4Blocked Shots6
14Fouls8
1Offsides0
1Goalkeeper Saves5
454Total Passes277
385Passes Accurate215
85%Pass Accuracy78%

Team Comparison

St. Louis CitySt. Louis City
Toronto FCToronto FC
1723Elo Rating 1546
3.03Attack 1.68
1.56Defense 0.88
66%Hit Rate 37%
10.1Shots per Game 14.9
5.1Shots on Target 5.7
3.3Corners per Game 4.1
1.7Cards per Game 1.8

AI Insights

🏠Strong Home Advantage+178 Elo
High Goal Expectancy3.5 goals
📈BTTS Trend
📊Home Overperforming

Game State Tendencies

St. Louis CitySt. Louis City
  • Leads at half-time in 80% of matches
  • Starts fast - scores more in 1st half (1.9 vs 1.1 in second half)
Toronto FCToronto FC
  • Comeback tendency: recovers from HT deficit 67% of the time
  • Scores more in 2nd half (1.3 vs 0.4 in first half)
  • Concedes more in 2nd half - can tire late

Head to Head

Based on 1 historical meeting

St. Louis City 100%Draw 0%0% Toronto FC
1Avg Goals
0%BTTS Rate
0%Over 2.5

Referee Profile

L. Szpala · 79 matches analysed

4.4Avg Yellows
4.6Avg Cards
23.5Avg Fouls
Stricter than 56% of referees analysed

League Table

Major League Soccer 2026

Western Conference

#TeamMPWDLGGDPtsForm
1Vancouver WhitecapsVancouver Whitecaps25154656:23+3349WLWLW
2Houston DynamoHouston Dynamo26135834:30+444DLWDD
3St. Louis CitySt. Louis City26128645:36+944WWDWD
4FC DallasFC Dallas26128649:42+744DWWWD
5San Jose EarthquakesSan Jose Earthquakes26126846:38+842DWWDD
6Los Angeles FCLos Angeles FC27118843:29+1441DLWDD
7Colorado RapidsColorado Rapids261131236:35+136DWDLW
8Los Angeles GalaxyLos Angeles Galaxy27891034:42-833WDLWL
9Portland TimbersPortland Timbers26951247:48-132LLDWL
10San DiegoSan Diego25861142:42030LLLWW
11AustinAustin26791032:44-1230DWDDW
12Real Salt LakeReal Salt Lake25851237:42-529LLLDL
13Seattle SoundersSeattle Sounders2478928:33-529DDDDD
14Minnesota United FCMinnesota United FC26781139:46-729LLLLD
15Sporting Kansas CitySporting Kansas City25531729:63-3418LWLLL
#TeamMPGPts
1Vancouver WhitecapsVancouver Whitecaps2556:2349
2Houston DynamoHouston Dynamo2634:3044
3St. Louis CitySt. Louis City2645:3644
4FC DallasFC Dallas2649:4244
5San Jose EarthquakesSan Jose Earthquakes2646:3842
6Los Angeles FCLos Angeles FC2743:2941
7Colorado RapidsColorado Rapids2636:3536
8Los Angeles GalaxyLos Angeles Galaxy2734:4233
9Portland TimbersPortland Timbers2647:4832
10San DiegoSan Diego2542:4230
11AustinAustin2632:4430
12Real Salt LakeReal Salt Lake2537:4229
13Seattle SoundersSeattle Sounders2428:3329
14Minnesota United FCMinnesota United FC2639:4629
15Sporting Kansas CitySporting Kansas City2529:6318

Eastern Conference

#TeamMPWDLGGDPtsForm
1Nashville SCNashville SC26176353:21+3257WDLDW
2New England RevolutionNew England Revolution26144845:33+1246WWWLW
3Inter MiamiInter Miami25129461:46+1545DDDWL
4CharlotteCharlotte26127747:37+1043WDWDW
5Chicago FireChicago Fire25116845:38+739LLDDD
6Philadelphia UnionPhiladelphia Union261061050:42+836WWWWW
7Orlando City SCOrlando City SC261041246:60-1434LWWWD
8New York Red BullsNew York Red Bulls26961134:48-1433WWLDL
9FC CincinnatiFC Cincinnati2589854:61-733DDLLD
10New York City FCNew York City FC26881039:34+532LWLDD
11DC UnitedDC United25611831:39-829LDWDL
12Toronto FCToronto FC26611939:49-1029LLWDD
13Columbus CrewColumbus Crew26751437:42-526WLLWL
14Atlanta United FCAtlanta United FC26751430:43-1326WDLDL
15CF MontrealCF Montreal26561531:53-2221LLLLL
#TeamMPGPts
1Nashville SCNashville SC2653:2157
2New England RevolutionNew England Revolution2645:3346
3Inter MiamiInter Miami2561:4645
4CharlotteCharlotte2647:3743
5Chicago FireChicago Fire2545:3839
6Philadelphia UnionPhiladelphia Union2650:4236
7Orlando City SCOrlando City SC2646:6034
8New York Red BullsNew York Red Bulls2634:4833
9FC CincinnatiFC Cincinnati2554:6133
10New York City FCNew York City FC2639:3432
11DC UnitedDC United2531:3929
12Toronto FCToronto FC2639:4929
13Columbus CrewColumbus Crew2637:4226
14Atlanta United FCAtlanta United FC2630:4326
15CF MontrealCF Montreal2631:5321
Promotion

St. Louis City vs Toronto FC Prediction

Our AI model has analysed this Major League Soccer fixture using team Elo ratings, recent form, projected goals and head-to-head history. The forecasts cover six independent markets - each probability is a separate model calculation, not derived from the match winner result.

How to Read These Forecasts

Each percentage shows the model's calculated likelihood for that outcome. Above 65% indicates strong statistical confidence; 45-65% reflects a competitive or open market; below 45% suggests the outcome is statistically less likely. All figures are for informational and entertainment purposes only.

About Major League Soccer

ScorePredicts covers USA football across all major markets. Use the navigation to explore today's full fixture list or filter by market.

Key Factors for This Match

St. Louis City have led at half-time in 80% of their recent matches. St. Louis City and Toronto FC have met 1 times recently, averaging 1 goals per game in those meetings. This forecast is based on a complete recent-form dataset for both teams.

All forecasts are generated by statistical and machine learning models for informational and entertainment purposes only. They are not guaranteed and do not constitute financial or betting advice.