Fleetwood Town vs Gillingham Prediction
AI Best Pick
Statistical forecasts for entertainment purposes only - not betting or financial advice.
Match Forecasts
Match Events
Lineups
1J. LynchJay Lynch
26S. RooneyShaun Rooney
6R. BennettRhys Bennett
5F. PotterFinley Potter
4H. NealHarrison Neal
29R. CirinoRaffaele Cirino
7A. CannonAndy Cannon
10M. HelmMark Helm
14L. McCannLewis McCann
17C. EvansChed Evans
9W. DaviesWill Davies
40A. Maynard-BrewerAshley Maynard-Brewer
5A. SmithAndy Smith
19O. BecklesOmar Beckles
26L. DobbsLogan Dobbs
22N. FreemanNick Freeman
15Z. AlbarusZane Albarus
14R. McKenzieRobbie McKenzie
7K. HarrisKadeem Harris
10R. HaleRonan Hale
16J. BrophyJames Brophy
9W. GoodwinWill GoodwinFleetwood Town Substitutes
Gillingham Substitutes
Match Stats
Team Comparison
AI Insights
Game State Tendencies
- Comeback tendency: recovers from HT deficit 100% of the time
- Concedes more in 1st half - tightens up after the break
- Tied at half-time in 60% of matches
- Comeback tendency: recovers from HT deficit 100% of the time
- Scores more in 2nd half (1.4 vs 0.4 in first half)
Head to Head
Based on 5 historical meetings
Recent Form
Referee Profile
D. Baines · 16 matches analysed
League Table
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 14:9 | +5 | 12 | WDDDW | |
| 2 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12:8 | +4 | 12 | LWWWW | |
| 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13:8 | +5 | 11 | WDLWD | |
| 4 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13:10 | +3 | 11 | WDWDL | |
| 5 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 8:4 | +4 | 10 | DDDWD | |
| 6 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 9:6 | +3 | 10 | WDDDD | |
| 7 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7:4 | +3 | 10 | DWDDD | |
| 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6:4 | +2 | 10 | DDDDW | |
| 9 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8:10 | -2 | 10 | LWWLW | |
| 10 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9:7 | +2 | 9 | LWDDD | |
| 11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8:6 | +2 | 9 | WWDDD | |
| 12 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8:8 | 0 | 8 | WDDLW | |
| 13 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7:9 | -2 | 8 | DLLWW | |
| 14 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8:7 | +1 | 7 | LLDWL | |
| 15 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7:9 | -2 | 7 | DWWLL | |
| 16 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9:10 | -1 | 6 | DLDWD | |
| 17 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3:5 | -2 | 6 | LWDDL | |
| 18 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4:10 | -6 | 6 | WLLWL | |
| 19 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10:11 | -1 | 5 | DLLDL | |
| 20 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4:5 | -1 | 5 | LDDLW | |
| 21 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10:13 | -3 | 5 | LWDLL | |
| 22 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3:7 | -4 | 5 | WLLDD | |
| 23 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6:11 | -5 | 4 | LLDLW | |
| 24 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5:10 | -5 | 4 | DLWLL |
| # | Team | MP | G | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | 14:9 | 12 | |
| 2 | 6 | 12:8 | 12 | |
| 3 | 6 | 13:8 | 11 | |
| 4 | 6 | 13:10 | 11 | |
| 5 | 6 | 8:4 | 10 | |
| 6 | 6 | 9:6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 6 | 7:4 | 10 | |
| 8 | 6 | 6:4 | 10 | |
| 9 | 6 | 8:10 | 10 | |
| 10 | 6 | 9:7 | 9 | |
| 11 | 6 | 8:6 | 9 | |
| 12 | 6 | 8:8 | 8 | |
| 13 | 6 | 7:9 | 8 | |
| 14 | 6 | 8:7 | 7 | |
| 15 | 6 | 7:9 | 7 | |
| 16 | 6 | 9:10 | 6 | |
| 17 | 6 | 3:5 | 6 | |
| 18 | 6 | 4:10 | 6 | |
| 19 | 6 | 10:11 | 5 | |
| 20 | 6 | 4:5 | 5 | |
| 21 | 6 | 10:13 | 5 | |
| 22 | 6 | 3:7 | 5 | |
| 23 | 6 | 6:11 | 4 | |
| 24 | 6 | 5:10 | 4 |
Fleetwood Town vs Gillingham Prediction
Our AI model has analysed this League Two fixture using team Elo ratings, recent form, projected goals and head-to-head history. The forecasts cover six independent markets - each probability is a separate model calculation, not derived from the match winner result.
How to Read These Forecasts
Each percentage shows the model's calculated likelihood for that outcome. Above 65% indicates strong statistical confidence; 45-65% reflects a competitive or open market; below 45% suggests the outcome is statistically less likely. All figures are for informational and entertainment purposes only.
About League Two
ScorePredicts covers England football across all major markets. Use the navigation to explore today's full fixture list or filter by market.
Key Factors for This Match
Fleetwood Town and Gillingham have met 5 times recently, averaging 1.81 goals per game in those meetings. This forecast is based on a complete recent-form dataset for both teams.
All forecasts are generated by statistical and machine learning models for informational and entertainment purposes only. They are not guaranteed and do not constitute financial or betting advice.


